New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2010-3411
Registrant Reference Number: PROSAR Case #1-23004071
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Scotts Canada Ltd.
Address: 2000 Argentia Road, Plaza 5, Suite 101
City: Mississauga
Prov / State: Ontario
Country: Canada
Postal Code: L5N2R7
Human
Country: CANADA
Prov / State: ONTARIO
Unknown
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 2217-896-239
Product Name: Weed-B-Gon MAX Plus Crabgrass Control Ready Spray
Yes
Unknown
Site: Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown
Other
Sex: Male
Age: >64 yrs / > 64 ans
System
Unknown / Inconnu
Yes
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Application
Unknown
Skin
Respiratory
Unknown / Inconnu
>3 days <=1 wk / >3 jours <=1 sem
1-23004071- The reporter calls to indicate her husband may have been exposed to an herbicide containing the active ingredients 2,4-D and dicamba. The caller indicated her husband was spraying the diluted product 2.5 weeks prior to the initial contact with the registrant. She did not indicate in what capacity he was spraying or the application rate. She did not describe a discreet exposure but posits possible dermal or inhalation exposure during application. The caller indicated during the initial call her husband had been admitted into the hospital, ill for 2 weeks, and they were ¿¿¿grasping at straws¿¿¿ to determine the etiology. The caller reported her spouse had developed symptoms of shortness of breath, generalized jaundice, and rash on both of his legs at an unspecified time frame following the exposure. She also indicated liver, splenic, pancreatic, and renal ¿¿¿issues¿¿¿ of an unspecified nature. The caller stated she initially had thought he had developed the ¿¿¿flu¿¿¿. The caller at the initial call indicated four specialists had evaluated her husband and had been unable to determine the cause of his illness. The caller was told the diluted product if encountered via the dermal and respiratory routes would be mainly expected to produce mild self-limiting irritation to those body surfaces. No systemic effect, as described, would be expected. On routine call back the reporter indicated her husband was still hospitalized. His liver, kidneys and pancreas were still ¿¿¿out of whack¿¿¿ to use her words. He had daily blood work run (unspecified). She reported his rash had resolved and jaundice was resolving. The caller indicates no definitive diagnosis had been reached but the doctors believe his symptoms may be an adverse reaction to an antibiotic he had been taking (Septra). The caller, further, stated his blood sugar had been running high (it was added he was diabetic) but this was being controlled with insulin. No further information is available on this case.
Major