New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2010-1428
Registrant Reference Number: PROSAR 1-21565125
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Address: 400 Plaza Drive
City: Secaucus
Prov / State: New Jersey
Country: USA
Postal Code: 07094-3688
Domestic Animal
Country: CANADA
Prov / State: QUEBEC
PMRA Registration No. 25655 PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No.
Product Name: Control Pet Care System Flea/Tick Guard for Cats (Canada)
PMRA Registration No. 24653 PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No.
Product Name: UltraGuard Plus Flea/Tick Home Spray (Canada)
Yes
Unknown
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Unknown
Animal's Owner
Cat / Chat
Domestic Longhair
1
Male
8
11.5
lbs
Skin
Unknown / Inconnu
<=30 min / <=30 min
System
Unknown / Inconnu
Yes
Yes
2
Day(s) / Jour(s)
Unknown/Inconnu
Treatment / Traitement
(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms
1-21565125: A reporter (cat owner) called on 02/02/2010 to report the exposure of her cat to a flea and tick spray containing the active ingredient Tetrachlorvinphos, and possible exposure to a flea and tick home spray containing the active ingredients Tetrachlorvinphos and Permethrin. According to the reporter, the cat spray was applied to the cat on 01/27/2010. The reporter wiped the cat down with a towel 10 minutes following product application, and the cat hid in the home. Several hours following product application, the cat was salivating, vomiting, having occasional muscle tremors, had dilated pupils and was depressed. The cat was evaluated by a veterinarian on 01/30/2010 where it received subcutaneous fluids. The reporter declined hospitalization, and the cat was not bathed. At the time of the report, the cat was still depressed and had a fever of 105.8 degrees F. It was not specified when the home spray was used or what the cat's potential exposure may have been. The reporter was advised that the cat should be bathed in a mild non-insecticidal shampoo and evaluated by a veterinarian given the persistent signs. The reporter was also advised of the company's cholinesterase testing program. On follow up on 02/05/2010, the reporter stated that the cat was taken back to the veterinarian on 02/03/2010 and hospitalized for 2 nights. At the time of the follow up, the reporter stated that the cat was doing better and would be discharged later that day. The reporter called back spontaneously and reported that the cat was doing better every day and just seemed a little bit weak. No further information was obtained.
Moderate