New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2010-0556
Registrant Reference Number: 577349
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc.
Address: 450-1st Street SW, Suite 2100
City: Calgary
Prov / State: AB
Country: Canada
Postal Code: T2P 5H1
Human
Country: UNITED STATES
Prov / State: TEXAS
Unknown
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 62719-480
Product Name: Surmount Herbicide
Liquid
Yes
Unknown
Site: Agricultural-Outdoor/Agricole-extérieur
Préciser le type: Ranch
Other
Sex: Female
Age: >64 yrs / > 64 ans
System
>2 mos and <=6mos />2 mois et <=6mois
Yes
Yes
1
Week(s) / Semaine(s)
Non-occupational
Other
None
Unknown
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
12/21/2009 Caller's brother began using the product at their ranch in March 2009. The caller states that the applications took place during windy conditions such that her brother would get some of the diluted herbicide on his clothing. He did not wear protective gear. After applications, the brother would reportedly leave the discarded contaminated clothing laying in a pile in the cabin. A few months later, their mother began to develop an unspecified respiratory condition and has been hospitalized off and on since June 2009. The caller was not able to elaborate any further on the nature of the respiratory illness. Some of the hospitalizations lasted a week or longer. She has had a tracheotomy tube placed and is currently on a ventilator. She has never smoked or had previous respiratory problems. She had no confirmed exposure to the product, and the treating physicians do not believe that any causal exposure to the product is involved with her current medical condition. It is not clear when the mother was in the cabin relative to when the contaminated clothing was left in the cabin before washing. The mother has a prior history of hypertension which was being treated with prescription medication.
Major
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Any relationship between the use of this product and the delayed development of the complications reported in this case is inconceivable and lacks and biological plausibility. Secondly, the product use history is extremely vague and lacks any description of a known or defined point of direct exposure to this product. Even had casual or incidental contact with this product occurred, such illness would be unexpected. When considering the body of regulatory data and post-marketing data as well as the weight of scientific peer reviewed evidence on the active ingredients used in this product such a causal relationship appears to be scientifically implausible.