New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2009-3948
Registrant Reference Number: Prosar 1-19242974
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Address: 400 Plaza Drive
City: Secaucus
Prov / State: New Jersey
Country: USA
Postal Code: 07094-3688
Domestic Animal
Country: UNITED STATES
Prov / State: OHIO
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 2596-151
Product Name: UltraGuard Flea/Tick Drops for Dogs/Puppies Over 60 lbs
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 2596-147
Product Name: UltraGuard One Spot Flea Egg/Larvae Treatment for Cats/Kittens
Liquid
Yes
Unknown
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Unknown
Animal's Owner
Cat / Chat
Domestic Shorthair
1
Female
0.25
Unknown
Skin
Unknown / Inconnu
>2 hrs <=8 hrs / > 2 h < = 8 h
System
Persisted until death
No
No
Died
Treatment / Traitement
(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms
1-19242974: A reporter (pet owner) called on 07/21/2009 to report the exposure of her cat to a flea egg and larvae product containing the active ingredient Methoprene and her dog to a flea and tick product containing the active ingredient Phenothrin. According to the reporter, the feline product was applied to the cat (1st Subform III) and the canine product was applied to the dog (2nd Subform III) on 07/19/2009. The reporter stated that the cat and dog are not friendly with each other, so no contact between the two pets would have occurred following product application. Three hours after the products were applied, the cat developed lethargy, anorexia and was not drinking. The dog developed vomiting, diarrhea, lethargy, and anorexia. The signs were persistent at the time of the report. The reporter was advised that the active ingredient in the feline product has little to no mammalian toxicity and would not be expected to result in the signs described. The canine product would also not be expected to result in adverse signs as described. The reporter was advised to bathe both animals in hand dish soap and have them evaluated by a veterinarian to determine what is causing the signs. On follow up, the reporter stated that the cat never improved and died before she took her to a veterinarian. The dog continued to have signs of diarrhea and anorexia. The reporter was encouraged to have the dog evaluated by a veterinarian. On follow up on 07/27/2009, the reporter stated that she did take the dog to the veterinarian but elected euthanasia as the dog started to lose weight and the signs persisted. Blood work results were pending. No further information was obtained.
Death
Animal's Owner
Dog / Chien
Mixed Breed
1
Male
3
75
lbs
Skin
Unknown / Inconnu
>2 hrs <=8 hrs / > 2 h < = 8 h
System
Persisted until death
Yes
Unknown
Euthanised / Euthanasie
Treatment / Traitement
(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms
1-19242974: A reporter (pet owner) called on 07/21/2009 to report the exposure of her cat to a flea egg and larvae product containing the active ingredient Methoprene and her dog to a flea and tick product containing the active ingredient Phenothrin. According to the reporter, the feline product was applied to the cat (1st Subform III) and the canine product was applied to the dog (2nd Subform III) on 07/19/2009. The reporter stated that the cat and dog are not friendly with each other, so no contact between the two pets would have occurred following product application. Three hours after the products were applied, the cat developed lethargy, anorexia and was not drinking. The dog developed vomiting, diarrhea, lethargy, and anorexia. The signs were persistent at the time of the report. The reporter was advised that the active ingredient in the feline product has little to no mammalian toxicity and would not be expected to result in the signs described. The canine product would also not be expected to result in adverse signs as described. The reporter was advised to bathe both animals in hand dish soap and have them evaluated by a veterinarian to determine what is causing the signs. On follow up, the reporter stated that the cat never improved and died before she took her to a veterinarian. The dog continued to have signs of diarrhea and anorexia. The reporter was encouraged to have the dog evaluated by a veterinarian. On follow up on 07/27/2009, the reporter stated that she did take the dog to the veterinarian but elected euthanasia as the dog started to lose weight and the signs persisted. Blood work results were pending. No further information was obtained.
Death