New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2008-5875
Registrant Reference Number: Prosar 1-16724446
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Syngenta Crop Protection Canada Inc.
Address: 140 Research Lane, Research Park
City: Guelph
Prov / State: Ontario
Country: Canada
Postal Code: N1G4Z3
Human
Country: UNITED STATES
Prov / State: ILLINOIS
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 100-1218
Product Name: Demon Max
Liquid
Unknown
Unknown
Medical Professional
Sex: Male
Age: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans
System
Unknown / Inconnu
Yes
Yes
Unknown
Occupational
Other
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
1-16724446: A reporter (pharmacist) called on 10/09/2008 to report the exposure of a male pest control operator to an insecticide containing the active ingredient Cypermethrin. According to the reporter, the man had been found unconscious on a lawn earlier in the day with a container of the product near him. The man had been admitted to the hospital and the reporter was calling to find out the toxicity of the product and any specific treatment protocols. The reporter was advised that the product has a wide margin of safety and low level of toxicity. The reporter was also advised that inhalation of the product may result in ocular and upper respiratory tract irritation resulting in coughing, difficulty breathing, and shortness of breath. Patients who smoke or have underlying respiratory conditions may experience more pronounced symptoms. In these patients, previously prescribed inhalers or nebulizer therapy may be indicated for acute respiratory symptoms. The reporter was advised that product exposure would not be expected to result in the signs described. The product's Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) was faxed to the reporter and the reporter was encouraged to call back with further questions. On follow up later on 10/09/2008, a hospital employee stated that the patient had been in cardiac arrest and had been resuscitated. No toxicology tests had been run, and the patient had been transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) at another medical facility. On follow up with the other medical facility on 10/09/2008, a reporter stated that the patient was still settling into the ICU. The reporter also stated that no further information could be given out unless the patient's family called directly to provide it. No further information was obtained. NOTE: Details of this case (including route of exposure, initial symptoms, time frame with respect to product exposure and development of symptoms, patient's pertinent medical history, and eventual diagnosis) are unknown. Actual product exposure was not witnessed.
Major
Details of this case (including route of exposure, initial symptoms, time frame with respect to product exposure and development of symptoms, patient's pertinent medical history, and eventual diagnosis) are unknown. Actual product exposure was not witnessed. The signs described are not consistent with routine product use.