Incident Report

Subform I: General Information

1. Report Type.

New incident report

Incident Report Number: 2008-0836

2. Registrant Information.

Registrant Reference Number: 282635

Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited

Address: 1 Webster Street

City: Brantford

Prov / State: ON

Country: Canada

Postal Code: N3T 5R1

3. Select the appropriate subform(s) for the incident.

Human

4. Date registrant was first informed of the incident.

25-JAN-08

5. Location of incident.

Country: CANADA

Prov / State: ONTARIO

6. Date incident was first observed.

Unknown

Product Description

7. a) Provide the active ingredient and, if available, the registration number and product name (include all tank mixes). If the product is not registered provide a submission number.

Active(s)

---

PMRA Registration No. 27945      PMRA Submission No.       EPA Registration No.

Product Name: Raid EarthBlends Ant + Spider Bug Killer 350g

• Active Ingredient(s)
  • PIPERONYL BUTOXIDE
  • PYRETHRINS

---

7. b) Type of formulation.

Application Information

8. Product was applied?

Yes

9. Application Rate.

Unknown

10. Site pesticide was applied to (select all that apply).

Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison

11. Provide any additional information regarding application (how it was applied, amount applied, the size of the area treated etc).

Please refer to field 13 on Subform II or field 17 of subform III for a detailed description regarding application.

To be determined by Registrant

12. In your opinion, was the product used according to the label instructions?

Yes

Subform II: Human Incident Report (A separate form for each person affected)

1. Source of Report.

Other

2. Demographic information of data subject

Sex: Male

Age: >19 <=64 yrs / >19 <=64 ans

3. List all symptoms, using the selections below.

System

• Eye
  • Symptom - Irritated eye

4. How long did the symptoms last?

>1 wk <=1 mo / > 1 sem < = 1 mois

5. Was medical treatment provided? Provide details in question 13.

Yes

6. a) Was the person hospitalized?

No

6. b) For how long?

7. Exposure scenario

Non-occupational

8. How did exposure occur? (Select all that apply)

Application

9. If the exposure occured during application or re-entry, what protective clothing was worn? (select all that apply)

Unknown

10. Route(s) of exposure.

Unknown

11. What was the length of exposure?

Unknown / Inconnu

12. Time between exposure and onset of symptoms.

<=30 min / <=30 min

13. Provide any additional details about the incident (eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms, type of medical treatment, results from medical tests, outcome of the incident, amount of pesticide exposed to, etc.)

1/25/2008Caller is the caretaker of a person who has used product to treat bedbugs in the home for the past three months. The patient developed eye irritation after a month of product use. The patient has not had any direct ocular exposure to product. The patient surmises that the bed bugs are somehow carrying the pesticide into his eyes. The patient has had eyes evaluated by doctor, and the doctor prescribed eye drops for treatment. The patient is still having symptoms. 2/1/2008Call back to caretaker for follow up. Patient was seen by doctor again, and was prescribed a cream to help treat the symptoms. The patient continues to experience symptoms.

To be determined by Registrant

14. Severity classification.

Moderate

15. Provide supplemental information here.

The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. Even though direct eye exposure with this pesticide typically leads to eye irritation, there is nothing in this history to indicate that this patient has experiences direct exposure to the eyes.