New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2007-5519
Registrant Reference Number: 182458
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Address: 1 Webster Street
City: Brantford
Prov / State: ON
Country: Canada
Postal Code: N3T 5R1
Domestic Animal
Country: UNITED STATES
Prov / State: ARIZONA
Unknown
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 4822-473
Product Name: Raid Ant Killer 16 -17.5 oz
Other (specify)
AerosolYes
Unknown
Site: Res. - Out Home / Rés - à l'ext.maison
Animal's Owner
Dog / Chien
Labrador Retriever
1
Female
6
70
lbs
Unknown
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
System
Persisted until death
Yes
Yes
3
Day(s) / Jour(s)
Not recovered / Non rétabli
Other / Autre
specify Clearly defined point of exposure or direct contact with pesticide or pesticide treated surface is not evident and based on speculation.
(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms
5/2/2007 Caller's husband was using the product outside the house on an ant hill and on the patio 2 days ago. The dog was outside when he was spraying. The dog may have licked the patio but no exposure was witnessed. Yesterday, the dog had stopped eating and drinking. Dog is drinking some today but still not eating. 5/24/2007 Follow-up with owner. Dog was diagnosed with renal failure by the DVM and eventually died after three days of hospitalization. The DVM determined that the dog¿¿¿s illness was not related to the pesticide.
Death
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews.Clearly defined point of exposure or direct contact with pesticide or pesticide treated surface is not evident. Even had casual contact with treated surface occurred, such a profound illness would not be expected. Treating veterinarian had also ruled out involvement of this pesticide.