Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2023-2292
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 3536838
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Scotts Canada Ltd.
Adresse: 2000 Argentia Road - Plaza 2 Suite 300
Ville: Mississauga
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: L5N1V8
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: NEW YORK
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 90780-1
Nom du produit: TOMCAT MOUSE KILLER E CHILD RESISTANT, REFILLABLE STATION
Appât
Non
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Mastiff
1
Femme
12
70.00
lbs
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Other / Autre
préciser Suspected but unwitnessed and unconfirmed ingestion of pesticide.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
3/4/2023 Caller initially calling about four kittens suspected to have ingested product after knocking down a bag. They are not included in this report as their symptoms of bloating do not rise to the level of reportability. She also has two dogs, one of which is asymptomatic and not included in this report as such. The other dog is suspected to have ingested an unknown amount of product an unknown time prior to the call. This dog has be has been shaking, inappetant, and vomiting since approximately 3/2/2023. No treatments have been performed. The product has also been intentionally placed around the home prior to the dog's suspected ingestion. 3/7/2023 Caller states that her symptomatic dog died at home yesterday. No treatment was done. She states that the pet was having symptoms 2 days prior to her calling us. No further information was collected.
Mort
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews.