Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2013-2905
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 130064160
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Farnam Companies, Inc.
Adresse: 301 W. Osborn Road
Ville: Phoenix
État: Arizona
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 85013
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: FLORIDA
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 270-263
Nom du produit: Farnam Bronco Gold Equine Fly Spray
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Non
Professionnel de la santé
Dog / Chien
American Pit Bull Terrier
1
Femme
1.75
35.0
lbs
Cutanée
>3 days <=1 wk / >3 jours <=1 sem
>8 hrs <=24 hrs / > 8 h < = 24 h
Système
Persisted until death
Oui
Oui
1
Day(s) / Jour(s)
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
On May 14, 2013, the owner topically applied Farnam Bronco Gold Equine Fly Spray on the dog. On May 15, 2013 the owner noticed that the dog had erythema and was red all over. On May 16, 2013 the owner took the dog to the veterinarian, where he was observed to be laterally recumbent and having tremors. The dog was given methocarbamol at the clinic. Later that day the owner's regular veterinarian contacted the Animal Product Safety Service (APSS) to obtain help. The APSS veterinarian stated that the product contains pyrethrins, and in order for neurologic signs to develop, the dog would need to be exposed to a large amount of the product; the APSS veterinarian thought it might be best to rule out other possibilities for the dog's illness. The APSS veterinarian recommended that the regular veterinarian provide symptomatic and supportive care, provide fluid therapy, give diazepam and methocarbamol, obtain additional information about the history of the exposure and how often the product had been used, call back with questions, perform a diagnostic evaluation, and do a chemistry profile and complete blood count (CBC).
Mort
The APSS veterinarian stated that the substance was considered to have a doubtful likelihood of causing the clinical situation. On May 21, 2013 an APSS veterinarian called the owner's regular veterinarian to update the case. The vet staff stated that the dog died on May 17, 2013 and that the dog tested positive for heartworms. The APSS veterinarian recommended that the owner's regular veterinarian call back if he wanted to discuss the case further. A necropsy was not available.