Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2011-5630
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case#: 1-27949292
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Adresse: 400 Plaza Drive
Ville: Secaucus
État: New Jersey
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 07094-3688
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: CALIFORNIA
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-140
Nom du produit: UltraGuard Plus Flea Tick Spray for Dogs
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-153
Nom du produit: UltraGuard Rid Flea Tick Shampoo with Oatmeal for Dogs
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Staffordshire Bull Terrier
1
Femme
1.16
47
lbs
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>2 hrs <=8 hrs / > 2 h < = 8 h
Système
Persisted until death
Oui
Inconnu
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-27949292- The reporter, a pet owner, indicated her animal was exposed to two insecticidal products. Te first contained the active ingredient phenothrin, the second tetrachlorvinphos and methoprene. The pet owner indicated she first bathed her fourteen month female forty-seven pound Staffordshire bull terrier with the former product and then applied the latter product as a spray to the animal. The application was done the night prior to her initial contact with the registrant. The pet owner indicated awakened her in the middle of the night vomiting and by morning she had diarrhea. Just prior to her initial contact she had noted blood in the animals vomit and diarrhea. The pet was also lethargic drooling and confused. The pet owner was advised to bathe the animal with a noninsecticidal shampoo and seek veterinary attention as needed for supportive care. The pet owner¿s veterinarian called later the same evening and was provided current standards of care following overdosage scenarios. One more follow up was obtained from the attending veterinarian that same evening. She reports the animal responded favorably to supportive care. Low dose atropine yielded a HR of 140 BPM. The veterinarian was advised to discontinue atropine and further support the animal after verifying the animal had been bathed with a noninsecticidal shampoo. On follow up the pet owner indicated the pet had died after it returned home from the veterinary clinic. The pet owner was advised of registrant supported necropsy to assist in determining the cause of death. The pet owner did not submit the animal for necropsy. The signs and out come would not be expected following use of the products as labeled. No further information is available.
Mort