Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2010-5184
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case #: 1-22938921
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): Syngenta Crop Protection
Adresse: 410 Swing Road
Ville: Greensboro
État: North Carolina
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 27419
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: CALIFORNIA
Inconnu
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 100-1218
Nom du produit: Demon MAX
Liquide
Inconnu
Inconnu
Professionnel de la santé
Dog / Chien
unknown
3
Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Inconnu
Inconnu
Mort
Contact treat.area/Contact surf. traitée
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-229389921-The reporter, a veterinarian, calls to indicate possible exposure of three patients to an insecticide containing the active ingredient Cypermethrin. The reporter indicates three patients of his have died recently. The animals were all dogs. One animal was a Shih-Tzu; the others unspecified breed, weight or age. He did indicate all may have died of ¿¿¿old age¿¿¿ and had numerous concurrent medical conditions (unspecified). The caller did not indicate any signs that may have preceded the deaths, any care that might have been given, or diagnostics that may have been offered. He was unable to specify when two of the animals had died (he indicated ¿¿¿the last while¿¿¿), but did indicate the Shih-Tzu dog had died 05/28/10. No necropsy was performed. The caller stated no exposure was observed but the pet¿¿¿s owner had stated a pest control operator had applied the product in her home in the recent past (unspecified date, unspecified application technique). The caller was informed the product carried a wide margin of safety and a low level of toxicity. Ingestions of small quantities of this product are unlikely to result in significant problems but if enough is ingested minor GI upset may result. No systemic effects including the deaths described would be expected under normal use circumstances. No further information is available.
Mort
Initial contact was by a vet who was merely conducting due diligence. It is highly unlikely that the pesticide was involved in the death of these animals. There was no evidence of direct exposure and no symptoms which could be related to cypermethrin.