Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2010-3871
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: PROSAR Case # 1-23086045
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): The Hartz Mountain Corporation
Adresse: 400 Plaza Drive
Ville: Secaucus
État: New Jersey
Pays: USA
Code postal /Zip: 07094-3688
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: UNITED STATES
État: KANSAS
ARLA No d'homologation ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation. 2596-147
Nom du produit: UltraGuard One Spot Flea Egg Larvae Treatment for Cats Kittens
Liquide
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Inconnu
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
domestic shorthair
1
Homme
7
10
lbs
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-23086045- The reporter called to indicate her animals had been exposed to pesticide containing the active ingredient S-Methoprene. The reporter states she applied the product, a topical antiparasitic, to six of her animals (cats) 06/12/10. This was six days prior to her initial contact with the registrant. The first animal, a seven year domestic shorthair cat (sub-form III, #3), developed ataxia and difficulty standing within two days of application. The owner brought the animal to the veterinarian who stated the animal had been "poisoned" and "nothing could be done". The caller brought the animal home and it died suddenly. The caller reports two additional animals, two 8 month male domestic shorthair cats (sub-form III. #2) developed the same symptoms (ataxia and difficulty rising) at an indeterminate time after application and also died suddenly five days after application. These animals were not brought to the veterinarian. The caller remarked that two more cats, 8 month male domestic shorthair cats (sub-form III. #3,and #4), were at the time of the call ill demonstrating ataxia and lethargy of indeterminate onset and one last animal, a 8 month male domestic shorthair cat, had remained asymptomatic. The specialist that spoke with the caller stated she seemed confused about time lines and details. The caller was told the active ingredient has a low order of toxicity in mammals. The symptoms seen in these animals would not be expected after dermal application of the product. She was advised to bathe the remaining animals in a non-insecticidal shampoo and seek prompt veterinary care. The caller was further advised the animals likely are suffering from some other unrelated illness. The pet owner indicated on routine call back that one more animal had died (unspecified time line), and one had remained asymptomatic. She did not indicate the status of the sixth. The reporter also indicated the animals were not her own at this point, but her sons and reside at another household. The specialist that spoke to the reporter on this occasion also indicated the reporter seemed confused about details of the case. No necropsy was performed and veterinary care was not provided after the initial appointment. No further information is available.
Mort
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
domestic shorthair
2
Homme
0.66
Inconnu
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-23086045- The reporter called to indicate her animals had been exposed to pesticide containing the active ingredient S-Methoprene. The reporter states she applied the product, a topical antiparasitic, to six of her animals (cats) 06/12/10. This was six days prior to her initial contact with the registrant. The first animal, a seven year domestic shorthair cat (sub-form III, #3), developed ataxia and difficulty standing within two days of application. The owner brought the animal to the veterinarian who stated the animal had been "poisoned" and "nothing could be done". The caller brought the animal home and it died suddenly. The caller reports two additional animals, two 8 month male domestic shorthair cats (sub-form III. #2) developed the same symptoms (ataxia and difficulty rising) at an indeterminate time after application and also died suddenly five days after application. These animals were not brought to the veterinarian. The caller remarked that two more cats, 8 month male domestic shorthair cats (sub-form III. #3,and #4), were at the time of the call ill demonstrating ataxia and lethargy of indeterminate onset and one last animal, a 8 month male domestic shorthair cat, had remained asymptomatic. The specialist that spoke with the caller stated she seemed confused about time lines and details. The caller was told the active ingredient has a low order of toxicity in mammals. The symptoms seen in these animals would not be expected after dermal application of the product. She was advised to bathe the remaining animals in a non-insecticidal shampoo and seek prompt veterinary care. The caller was further advised the animals likely are suffering from some other unrelated illness. The pet owner indicated on routine call back that one more animal had died (unspecified time line), and one had remained asymptomatic. She did not indicate the status of the sixth. The reporter also indicated the animals were not her own at this point, but her sons and reside at another household. The specialist that spoke to the reporter on this occasion also indicated the reporter seemed confused about details of the case. No necropsy was performed and veterinary care was not provided after the initial appointment. No further information is available.
Mort
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
domestic shorthair
1
Homme
0.6
Inconnu
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Persisted until death
Non
Non
Mort
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-23086045- The reporter called to indicate her animals had been exposed to pesticide containing the active ingredient S-Methoprene. The reporter states she applied the product, a topical antiparasitic, to six of her animals (cats) 06/12/10. This was six days prior to her initial contact with the registrant. The first animal, a seven year domestic shorthair cat (sub-form III, #3), developed ataxia and difficulty standing within two days of application. The owner brought the animal to the veterinarian who stated the animal had been "poisoned" and "nothing could be done". The caller brought the animal home and it died suddenly. The caller reports two additional animals, two 8 month male domestic shorthair cats (sub-form III. #2) developed the same symptoms (ataxia and difficulty rising) at an indeterminate time after application and also died suddenly five days after application. These animals were not brought to the veterinarian. The caller remarked that two more cats, 8 month male domestic shorthair cats (sub-form III. #3,and #4), were at the time of the call ill demonstrating ataxia and lethargy of indeterminate onset and one last animal, a 8 month male domestic shorthair cat, had remained asymptomatic. The specialist that spoke with the caller stated she seemed confused about time lines and details. The caller was told the active ingredient has a low order of toxicity in mammals. The symptoms seen in these animals would not be expected after dermal application of the product. She was advised to bathe the remaining animals in a non-insecticidal shampoo and seek prompt veterinary care. The caller was further advised the animals likely are suffering from some other unrelated illness. The pet owner indicated on routine call back that one more animal had died (unspecified time line), and one had remained asymptomatic. She did not indicate the status of the sixth. The reporter also indicated the animals were not her own at this point, but her sons and reside at another household. The specialist that spoke to the reporter on this occasion also indicated the reporter seemed confused about details of the case. No necropsy was performed and veterinary care was not provided after the initial appointment. No further information is available.
Mort
Propriétaire de l'animal
Cat / Chat
domestic shorthhair
1
Homme
0.6
Inconnu
Cutanée
Unknown / Inconnu
Unknown / Inconnu
Système
Unknown / Inconnu
Non
Non
Unknown/Inconnu
Treatment / Traitement
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
1-23086045- The reporter called to indicate her animals had been exposed to pesticide containing the active ingredient S-Methoprene. The reporter states she applied the product, a topical antiparasitic, to six of her animals (cats) 06/12/10. This was six days prior to her initial contact with the registrant. The first animal, a seven year domestic shorthair cat (sub-form III, #3), developed ataxia and difficulty standing within two days of application. The owner brought the animal to the veterinarian who stated the animal had been "poisoned" and "nothing could be done". The caller brought the animal home and it died suddenly. The caller reports two additional animals, two 8 month male domestic shorthair cats (sub-form III. #2) developed the same symptoms (ataxia and difficulty rising) at an indeterminate time after application and also died suddenly five days after application. These animals were not brought to the veterinarian. The caller remarked that two more cats, 8 month male domestic shorthair cats (sub-form III. #3,and #4), were at the time of the call ill demonstrating ataxia and lethargy of indeterminate onset and one last animal, a 8 month male domestic shorthair cat, had remained asymptomatic. The specialist that spoke with the caller stated she seemed confused about time lines and details. The caller was told the active ingredient has a low order of toxicity in mammals. The symptoms seen in these animals would not be expected after dermal application of the product. She was advised to bathe the remaining animals in a non-insecticidal shampoo and seek prompt veterinary care. The caller was further advised the animals likely are suffering from some other unrelated illness. The pet owner indicated on routine call back that one more animal had died (unspecified time line), and one had remained asymptomatic. She did not indicate the status of the sixth. The reporter also indicated the animals were not her own at this point, but her sons and reside at another household. The specialist that spoke to the reporter on this occasion also indicated the reporter seemed confused about details of the case. No necropsy was performed and veterinary care was not provided after the initial appointment. No further information is available.
Modérée