Nouvelle déclaration d'incident
No de la demande: 2008-5566
Numéro de référence du titulaire d'homologation: 331231
Nom du titulaire (nom légal complet, aucune abbréviation): S.C. Johnson and Son, Limited
Adresse: 1 Webster Street
Ville: Brantford
État: ON
Pays: Canada
Code postal /Zip: N3T 5R1
Incident chez un animal domestique
Pays: CANADA
État: ONTARIO
ARLA No d'homologation 18449 ARLA No de la demande d'homologation EPA No d'homologation.
Nom du produit: Raid Liquid Ant Killer 100 ml (Canada)
Oui
Inconnu
Site: Res. - In Home / Rés. - à l'int. maison
Propriétaire de l'animal
Dog / Chien
Golden Retriever
1
Femme
9
65.00
lbs
Inconnu
<=15 min / <=15 min
>2 hrs <=8 hrs / > 2 h < = 8 h
Système
>2 hrs <=8 hrs / > 2 h < = 8 h
Oui
Non
Fully Recovered / Complètement rétabli
Other / Autre
préciser Defined point of exposure not evident or witnessed. Exposure based on speculation.
(p.ex. description des symptômes tels que la fréquence et la gravité
6/12/2008 Caller reports applying several drops of product on the carpet yesterday. Caller saw dog in the area, but did not witness any direct exposure. Today the dog is not eating, is lethargic, and panting. The dog appears distressed. 6/16/2008 Callback to original caller. The dog was evaluated by a veterinarian and was diagnosed with a pulled ligament. They ruled out any involvement of the pesticide. The caller states that the dog began eating and drinking again several hours after the original call and was doing fine.
Modérée
The information contained in this report is based on self-reported statements provided to the registrant during telephone Interview(s). These self-reported descriptions of an incident have not been independently verified to be factually correct or complete descriptions of the incident. For that reason, information contained in this report does not and can not form the basis for a determination of whether the reported clinical effects are causally related to exposure to the product identified in the telephone interviews. As indicated in the original history of this case, the dog's initial symptoms were attributed to the stress of having a pulled ligament. The DVM ruled out any involvement of the pesticide.