New incident report
Incident Report Number: 2016-6717
Registrant Reference Number: 2016KP275
Registrant Name (Full Legal Name no abbreviations): Bayer Inc
Address: 2920 matheson BLVD
City: Mississaugua
Prov / State: ON
Country: Canada
Postal Code: L4W 5R6
Domestic Animal
Country: UNITED STATES
Prov / State: UNKNOWN
PMRA Registration No. PMRA Submission No. EPA Registration No. 11556-155
Product Name: Seresto Collar
Other (specify)
collarYes
Other Units: collar
Site: Animal / Usage sur un animal domestique
Other
Cat / Chat
Domestic Medium hair
1
Male
12
8
lbs
Skin
>1 wk <=1 mo / > 1 sem < = 1 mois
>24 hrs <=3 days / >24 h <=3 jours
System
Persisted until death
No
No
Died
Treatment / Traitement
(eg. description of the frequency and severity of the symptoms
On 23Sep2016 the cat exhibited application site dampness as though excessively grooming (application site hair change), hiding, and lethargy, which worsened. The owner removed the collar. On 24 Sep 2016, the owner discovered that the cat had died overnight. No necropsy was performed. Follow up received on 23rd Sep 2016: On 23Sep2016 the cat exhibited application site dampness as though excessively grooming (application site licking), hiding, and lethargy. The owner removed the collar and the lethargy worsened.
Death
The described application site dampness is not typically seen with product use. Sign is likely a result of excessive grooming behaviour. Hiding and lethargy are unspecific and may have numerous other causes. Signs may occur initially after collar administration. Death is not expected following appropriate topical product application as inconsistent with products pharmacological profile. Oral exposure to the collar is not expected to cause serious signs either. An overdose of 5 collars around the neck was investigated in adult cats and dogs for an 8 months period and in 10 week old kittens and 7 week old puppies for a 6 months period without causing serious signs. Time to onset is short. Moreover the animal was geriatric and was in fair condition, which may have contributed to the death of the animal. Although no necropsy performed, product involvement is not likely, however due to limited information case is considered unassessable.